Effects of Democratic and Autocratic management

Effects of elected and Autocratic worryDifferent companies consider different instruction systems. tout ensemble(prenominal) omnibus destinys to use special direction title for developing their experience play on. Managers privateities go forth influence the type of tendency adopted. Selecting the correct circumspection room may lead to greater motivation and productivity the spielers. There atomic number 18 legion(predicate) wariness directions, such as representative, autocratic, consultative, Laissez Faire, and paternalistic. Every management style leads to each community has a different structure. If a community has a good management style, it get out remind its workforce. It may get a participation get to a greater extent profits. If managers penury to build a productive company, selecting a right management style is very primal. Although each management style not only has advantages, for a company, they engage to choose a management style c a rfully. If the management style cannot spark workers, this company bequeath have big problems, such as lower efficiency, hardly entire tasks or hardly execute managers ends. Managers have many another(prenominal) different ship canal to handle their labours. Some managers demand to finish uply control the workers some managers necessity to let workers more relaxed and have the freedom to finish their jobs. In this essay, I will equalise and contrast two different management styles, which ar elective and autocratic, and evaluate how they can affect employees and motivate them.Firstly, I will pardon democratic management style. This management style allows nation joining manage the company and having their own ideas and ship canal for finish their jobs. However, workers must complete the job on time. Bill Gates is the close famous compositors case of using the democratic management style. If the workers has different opinions, Bill encourage workers deal with him. (Ru th, 2008) low this management style, when managers need to view as important conclusivenesss, they will hands a meeting listen to their workers ideas or suggestions. This way involves workers to manage the company workers will hark back they are a circumstances of company. Many plurality dependable work for money, if managers have no idea about how to motivate them it may be result in lower efficiency. For a company to use, a management style of democratic which require worker have professional skills. And then, I will illustrate advantages and harms about democratic management style. If the company use democratic management style, directors can get along well with workers, because between the boss and the workers, good communication is very important. olibanum democratic management style helps them have a good communication. When important and complex decisions need to be made, the managers may be not commensurate to consider all of the ways, so listening to another(pre nominal) sights ideas is very important. The democratic management style has the higher degree of motivation people. Although the democratic management style has many advantages, it too has some disadvantages. When the company has to make a decision, it will spend lots of time on amass the workers ideas. They need hold to a meeting, and then choose the best solution. some other disadvantage is that if the workers have not enough skill and experience, potential mistakes are exiting, and sometimes, the manager cannot accepts workers ideas on each decision, workers will think the managers do not pry them. It will be harmful develop company. (Blurt it, 1999)Secondly, I will explain autocratic management style. This management style is totally different to democratic. Howell Raines and Martha Stewart is the upright exemplification of how to use the autocratic management style to construct a successful company. (Money-zine, 1999) Autocratic management style means the manager make all the important decisions, and require workers sightly need to complete tasks. In all the processes, workers do not take part in decision making. This will lead to workers is no sense of belonging, and workers cannot show their special abilities. Under this management style, workers just follow the directors commands. There are some advantages, the decision made quickly, because directors do not spend time on collecting workers ideas, and so, the tasks will be faultless on time. Another advantage is that autocratic management style helps companies change magnitude efficiency when the company employ many lower skilled workers. On the other hand, this management style also has some weaknesses. There is no two- way communication between managers and workers. Managers just require workers what they should do, but directors do not want to know what they think. Another disadvantage is that workers cannot always work hard for company. If there is other company can offer the higher sa lary, the worker will resign. This will capture a problem for building a successful company. (Learn management2, 2000)Thirdly, I want to illustrate how to motivate workers? Workers are the basic resources of a company, so if managers want to build a successful firm, motivating them is very important. Motivating workers not only one way which plus salary, there are many ways for motivation labour. First, managers must have a good example for cheerful. Second, managers need to listen to workers think. Third, managers can draw a good icon of future showing for workers. Fourth, managers can not blind making decisions because of their personal like and dislike. Through above four methods, it can help motivate workers. In fact, not everyone works just for money. Many people think work is very interesting, so managers need to try to use another way to motivate them, other than increasing their wages. (Wiki how, 1999)Finally, I will compare which management style can more affect employee the most. Every style has good aspects for the companies. In this part, I will mainly compare democratic management style and autocratic management style. Democratic management style allow people to join decisions making, although the company need to spend more time collecting ideas, this way can improve workers ebullience. Once people have a sense of belonging, people will work harder. They will think the company is like working for their family they will have greater powerful for job. However, there also are risks for the company. If workers take part in decisions, they must have professional skills and enough experiences, if some people do not actually reach this level, the mistakes will be made. On the other hand, under the autocratic management style, managers make all the decision, people just follow the order working. In fact, this management style also influences workers. dominating leader always think people just work for money, so if they pay workers, the workers will fo llow their orders, and the job will be completed on time. If a manager chooses the autocratic management style, they think increase the salary can motivate them.Nowadays, almost managers choose to allow people take part in decision making, because when managers want to encourage employees go to decision making, the autocratic management style should be not used, and if the workers constrain repugnant, the autocratic management style are also not effective. (Money-zine, 1999) In order to reduce the risks, they through provide more professional teaching chance for workers, or cooperate with professional school for obtain labour. If building a company, the boss makes all the decisions, and controls everything. It will lead to the boss having to work all the time and the potential mistake will still exist. It may be bad for the company. Mr. Robbins said that work committees and meetings are tow most popular ways of encouraging workers participation. (Stephen, 2002) Therefore, althoug h the company need to spend many times on collecting ideas form workers almost managers choose allowing workers winning part in decision making, such as democratic management style or paternalistic management style, and try to other ways to reduce mistake or error.Whether democratic or autocratic, managers just want to choose the best management style for their company. I think all managers want to motivate workers and increase efficiency. However, they choose different way to make their goal. The democratic management style and the autocratic management style are totally opposite management style. The democratic management style allow workers attend to make decisions, making workers feel they are a part of the company, and making them know development of the company is also their responsibility. However, the autocratic management style, managers make all the decisions, workers just complete managers commands. This allows workers do their job, and get their salary. Whether the com pany develop or not, they will not care. In the long term, their enthusiasm decrease. If managers want to motivate them, it may be by through increasing their income, but this is not the best way for motivation. If managers want to build a more efficiently company, motivating workers is become the most important thing.