Would Juluis caesar be a good king

Would Julius Caesar be a good powerfulness? Julius Caesar takes place in ancient capital of Italy in 44 B. C. He was never technic in ally king, except he came close to having the powers of a king, only he got killed before he could have matchless. He is in truth autocratic end-to-end the story go he is cool off alive. He is pretty stubborn while be p retty manipulative simply pauperization almost every compositors case in the play. I dont feel like he will be a good king just because of his haughtiness. He also had his good qualities like being a military astermind.Caesar shows us his arrogance throughout the play. For example in proceed 1 circumstance 2 he says Such men as he be never at hearts peace of mind Whiles they behold a longer than themselves, and whence are they very dangerous. I earlier tell thee what is to be feard than what I fear, for invariably I am Caesar . In this bring up we can see that is Caesar unashamed of how unconditional he is being . This arrogance would cause him to do other errors like he did subsequently in the story like ignoring his wifes dreamHe was great ruler because he led capital of Italy in the right direction, except by doing so, in the process he was an arrogant and selfish ruler. He was great for Rome as a ruler yet not for the people. Just like Brutus verbalise in Act 2 expectation 1 And therefore think him as a serpents egg which, natchd, would, as his kind, climb up mischievous, and ill shell. Here Brutus is comparing Caesar to a Serpents Egg that is should be destroyed before it hatches and becomes dangerous if he becomes king.They are not afraid of him ecause he is a tyrant precisely will become one if he becomes the king of Rome. In the watchword Julius Caesar manipulation seems like a varsity sport. In Act 2 Scene 1 Caesar really deceives the Romans. He is displace a show and ref apply that he doesnt want the blossom, still though he would on the Q.T. love it deep inside. He thinks that refusal to the crown in front of the public is a smart political tactic to rifle people to love him and think he less ambitious or for escape of better word desperate.This is also a form of reverse hycology as Caesar is using it to make the crowd like him and even consider making him king as he is not greedy and hungry for it. In conclusion Caesar would be a great king for Rome but not for the Romans. He is a principal in warfare but is very arrogant which cost him his life. If he was king his arrogance would definitely be his downfall. And the romans would adventure out that he was manipulating them, it was Just a matter of time. He would be a very good war antique of be a ruler with Pompey but not a king all by himself.